Saulo Silva's Blog

The last release of  Java—version 1.6.0 update 21—was rebranded as being made by “Oracle” instead of “Sun Microsystems, Inc”.

The problem is that Eclipse uses that value to decide on whether or not to pass a specific argument to the Virtual Machine.

This change affects Eclipse versions 3.3 (released in 2007) to 3.6 (released in 2010), causing the IDE to hang consistently, without any error messages.

The guys at Eclipse.org have posted three workarounds for this issue. (Since I’m using Helios, I opted for no. 3.)

Here is the bug  on the Oracle and on the Eclipse side.

I wanted to read a properties file from a servlet without using a hard-coded, absolute path. I tried to search on the web for a portable solution, but I couldn’t find anything.

Here is the trick: use ServletContext.getRealPath(String). For instance, a file called “config.properties” located in “WEB-INF”, can be loaded like this:

public void init(ServletConfig config) throws ServletException {
	String pathToPropertiesFile =
		config.getServletContext().getRealPath("")
		+ "/WEB-INF/config.properties";
	Properties properties = new Properties();
	properties.load(new FileInputStream(pathToPropertiesFile));
}

In one of the courses I took this session I was introduced to aspect-oriented programming. For those who are not familiar with it, an aspect can be used to implement a concern that is crosscutting among different components.

There are a few such concerns that are commonly affected by crosscutting, namely: authentication, persistence, logging and contract checking.

It is argued that with object-oriented programming, even after proper refactoring, it is not always possible to map a requirement to a single component. When a requirement is implemented by more than one component, scattering occurs. AOP allows you to localize the scattered requirement into an aspect.

AspectJ is an extension to the Java language that adds support to AOP. An aspect in AspectJ is composed of pointcuts and advices. A pointcut defines the condition that needs to be met in order for the logic in an advice to be executed. A pointcut could be, for instance, the execution of a method in a particular class.

How AspectJ can be useful

Let’s look at an example. Say we want to log when horses drink water and when cows eat grass. Assume we have a class Logger with a static method log(). Here’s what the implementation could look like:

public class Horse {
	private int consumedWaterInLitres;

	public void drink() {
		consumedWaterInLitres++;
		Logger.log("A horse is drinking water.");
	}
}

public class Cow {
	private int consumedGrassInGrams;

	public void eat() {
		consumedGrassInGrams++;
		Logger.log("A cow is eating grass.");
	}
}

The argument is that the concern of logging is now crosscut among the Horse and Cow components. In addition, it can be said that Horse.drink() and Cow.eat() are responsible for more core logic (eating and drinking) than they should have been. Let’s try to fix this problem with an aspect:

public aspect Logging {
	pointcut logHorseDrinking() : call(public void Horse.drink());
	pointcut logCowEating() : call(public void Cow.eat());

	void after() : logHorseDrinking() {
		Logger.log("A horse is drinking water.");
	}

	void after() : logCowEating() {
		Logger.log("A cow is eating grass.");
	}
}

Here we defined two pointcuts that capture calls to Horse.drink() and to Cow.eat(). We’ve attached these pointcuts to two advices that will run after these methods are executed. With the Logging aspect in place, we can now remove all calls to Logger.log() from Horse and Cow. Isn’t that great?

How AspectJ can be dangerous

Aspects can also add state, behaviour and inheritance to a component. Privileged aspects have access to all features in a system—including private ones. Does that raise a red flag? Let’s look at the class Dog below.

public class Dog {
}

It has no features—no attributes nor methods—and doesn’t extend from any class, right? Wrong:

public aspect DogAspect {
	declare parents: Dog extends Animal;
	private String Dog.ownersName = "Bobert";

	public String Dog.getOwnwersName() {
		return ownersName;
	}
}

The aspect above has completely changed the class Dog. It has made it an Animal, it has added an attribute ownersName and a getter for it. The worst part is that Dog is completely oblivious to the aspect—it will never know about it. In fact, unless you as a developer look at all aspects on the system, you will never know about it either.

That is not completely true because some IDEs will provide a visual clue whenever a class is affected by an aspect. The AspectJ Developement Tools add-on for Eclipse (a great IDE by the way) is supposed to show a marker on the editor margin whenever a component is being advised by an aspect. I have the latest version installed (ADJT 1.6.4) but for some reason the marker is not showing up, unfortunately.

There are also other issues one might encounter when using AspectJ. It is not an easy task to document the impact aspects have on a system—UML has no support for aspects at this moment, and how are you going to show that on a sequence diagram? Also, the debugging and tracing of execution of a class that is being advised by an aspect can get pretty tricky.

In conclusion

I believe that the application of AOP could indeed improve the quality of a system through the localization of crosscutting concerns. However, its Java implementation—AspectJ—provides a level of control that is too risky to be used in industrial medium- to large-scale projects. Its supporting technologies and documenting tools have not yet reached the desired maturity level.

Since last summer I’ve been working with three other Software Engineering undergraduates on a web enterprise application that will eventually replace a legacy ERP system. We used patterns from Martin Fowler’s Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture (a great book, by the way), and the well-known three-layered architecture.

One day we had a discussion related to the persistence of Domain Models and whether we should enforce foreign-key constraints at the database level. My first reaction was that the very use of a relational database implied the enforcement of such constraints, but some of my colleagues argued that the database should be seen as nothing but a persistence mechanism and therefore we should avoid placing any business logic in it. We ended up by not using foreign-key constraints.

Would you have done otherwise? I would like to hear what other software engineers/developers have to say about this.

Hey guys, sorry for the lack of updates. My last semester has been a little bit hectic, but in three months I’ll be a (Junior) Software Engineer! :)

Here’s a little video I just stumbled upon on reddit.

Google confirmed tomorrow’s launch of Google Chrome beta, a new open source web browser that borrows the rendering engine from Apple’s WebKit and components from Mozilla Firefox.

An important design aspect behind Google Chrome is that each tab will be assigned an entire process instead of a thread within a process. This means that if a particular website causes the page to hang, only its tab will have to be closed. In addition, a task manager will allow the user to see which page, plug-in or web application is consuming system resources, a feature available in all modern OSs.

Google has published a comic that explains in 38 pages their web browser project.

How will this affect the battle for market share between existing web browsers? Will Google Chrome be adopted by Firefox or IE users?

Update 1: added a screenshot (found at TechCrunch).
Update 2: The Google Chrome webpage is up.