Comments on: Aspect-oriented programming with AspectJ http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/ On technology, programming, et cetera Wed, 01 Dec 2010 03:53:40 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Saulo http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-209 Saulo Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:34:36 +0000 http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-209 I see what you mean. As I wanted to get into a simple practical example quickly, I might have provided a rather unsatisfactory definition (for a layman, at least). Thanks much for reading the article and thanks for your comments. I see what you mean. As I wanted to get into a simple practical example quickly, I might have provided a rather unsatisfactory definition (for a layman, at least).

Thanks much for reading the article and thanks for your comments.

]]> By: Saulo http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-208 Saulo Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:34:14 +0000 http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-208 I agree–you can really break encapsulation with AspectJ if you are not careful. I agree–you can really break encapsulation with AspectJ if you are not careful.

]]> By: fogus http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-57 fogus Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:20:08 +0000 http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-57 <blockquote>...an aspect can be used to implement a concern that is crosscutting among different components.</blockquote> I was a little worried when I read this as it is one of those self-licking lollipop kind of definitions that only makes sense if you already know what AOP means. However, you pull it together after that and explain the essentials nicely. -m

…an aspect can be used to implement a concern that is crosscutting among different components.

I was a little worried when I read this as it is one of those self-licking lollipop kind of definitions that only makes sense if you already know what AOP means. However, you pull it together after that and explain the essentials nicely.
-m

]]> By: Achim Demelt http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-56 Achim Demelt Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:20:13 +0000 http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-56 Good summary, and I completely share your concerns. I really love the AO paradigm, but AspectJ is simply too powerful. The Java programming language is too low-level for successful AO application. I prefer applying aspects on a higher level of abstraction (e.g. models). Under no circumstances must aspects be allowed to break the encapsulation of classes or components. Good summary, and I completely share your concerns. I really love the AO paradigm, but AspectJ is simply too powerful. The Java programming language is too low-level for successful AO application.

I prefer applying aspects on a higher level of abstraction (e.g. models). Under no circumstances must aspects be allowed to break the encapsulation of classes or components.

]]>