<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Saulo Silva&#039;s Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://saulosilva.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://saulosilva.com</link>
	<description>On technology, programming, et cetera.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 02:11:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPod + cell phone + web + email = iPhone by Saulo</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2007/01/ipod-cell-phone-web-email-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Saulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 02:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/wordpress/?p=32#comment-167</guid>
		<description>I got an iPhone two months ago—I&#039;m loving it!

I had considered getting an Android phone, but I am not an early adopter. Maybe when it gets a bit more mature.

Anyway, thanks for visiting my blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got an iPhone two months ago—I&#8217;m loving it!</p>
<p>I had considered getting an Android phone, but I am not an early adopter. Maybe when it gets a bit more mature.</p>
<p>Anyway, thanks for visiting my blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on iPod + cell phone + web + email = iPhone by Glenn</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2007/01/ipod-cell-phone-web-email-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-148</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/wordpress/?p=32#comment-148</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading your blog. I just read that Brits vote iPhone 8th greatest invention. I love my Iphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading your blog. I just read that Brits vote iPhone 8th greatest invention. I love my Iphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How games negatively affected my life by tidyjustice</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2007/07/how-games-negatively-affected-my-life/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>tidyjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/wordpress/?p=19#comment-43</guid>
		<description>games are there to pass the time not to pass your life away</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>games are there to pass the time not to pass your life away</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How games negatively affected my life by tidyjustice</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2007/07/how-games-negatively-affected-my-life/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>tidyjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/wordpress/?p=19#comment-42</guid>
		<description>played wow since it first came out quit it loads and noticed slight changes. end of day if ur so obsessed by a game where u join some raiding guild where u raid 24/7 never see day light and never go out at 6pm-10pm because of raiding shedules then u seriously need a smack in the head :D ever since wow began i have played till now casually, been a lil omfg u killed me must spend 4 hours killing you thing :D but yeh pvp is all i do PvE and arena is what kills people its a game stop getting obssesed unless u really are that damn good u can enter tournies and earn 20k :) end of day its a game just like dreamcast sega saturn its fun u die u die rez and kill back if not /quit and have a sleep :D
lifes a bitch but always remember the clock is ticking and your life is slipping. good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>played wow since it first came out quit it loads and noticed slight changes. end of day if ur so obsessed by a game where u join some raiding guild where u raid 24/7 never see day light and never go out at 6pm-10pm because of raiding shedules then u seriously need a smack in the head :D ever since wow began i have played till now casually, been a lil omfg u killed me must spend 4 hours killing you thing :D but yeh pvp is all i do PvE and arena is what kills people its a game stop getting obssesed unless u really are that damn good u can enter tournies and earn 20k :) end of day its a game just like dreamcast sega saturn its fun u die u die rez and kill back if not /quit and have a sleep :D<br />
lifes a bitch but always remember the clock is ticking and your life is slipping. good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How games negatively affected my life by Fabio</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2007/07/how-games-negatively-affected-my-life/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 21:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/wordpress/?p=19#comment-41</guid>
		<description>This instructions may help the the younger kids, 4chan users and such... it speaks their language, with a powerful message...
http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/5103/1195719211326nj1.gif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This instructions may help the the younger kids, 4chan users and such&#8230; it speaks their language, with a powerful message&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/5103/1195719211326nj1.gif" rel="nofollow">http://img517.imageshack.us/img517/5103/1195719211326nj1.gif</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should we use foreign-key constraints when persisting Domain Models? by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2009/02/domain-model-persistence-and-foreign-key-constraints/comment-page-1/#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/?p=253#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I agree that the database is in the data layer, however I see no problem in having an &quot;extra&quot; check in your database apart from requiring you to consistently chance the checks when you change the logic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the database is in the data layer, however I see no problem in having an &#8220;extra&#8221; check in your database apart from requiring you to consistently chance the checks when you change the logic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aspect-oriented programming with AspectJ by Saulo</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Saulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-209</guid>
		<description>I see what you mean. As I wanted to get into a simple practical example quickly, I might have provided a rather unsatisfactory definition (for a layman, at least).

Thanks much for reading the article and thanks for your comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see what you mean. As I wanted to get into a simple practical example quickly, I might have provided a rather unsatisfactory definition (for a layman, at least).</p>
<p>Thanks much for reading the article and thanks for your comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aspect-oriented programming with AspectJ by Saulo</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>Saulo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-208</guid>
		<description>I agree–you can really break encapsulation with AspectJ if you are not careful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree–you can really break encapsulation with AspectJ if you are not careful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aspect-oriented programming with AspectJ by fogus</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>fogus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-57</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;...an aspect can be used to implement a concern that is crosscutting among different components.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was a little worried when I read this as it is one of those self-licking lollipop kind of definitions that only makes sense if you already know what AOP means.  However, you pull it together after that and explain the essentials nicely.
-m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>&#8230;an aspect can be used to implement a concern that is crosscutting among different components.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was a little worried when I read this as it is one of those self-licking lollipop kind of definitions that only makes sense if you already know what AOP means.  However, you pull it together after that and explain the essentials nicely.<br />
-m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Aspect-oriented programming with AspectJ by Achim Demelt</title>
		<link>http://saulosilva.com/2009/03/aspect-oriented-programming-with-aspectj/comment-page-1/#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>Achim Demelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pensador.org/?p=276#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Good summary, and I completely share your concerns. I really love the AO paradigm, but AspectJ is simply too powerful. The Java programming language is too low-level for successful AO application.

I prefer applying aspects on a higher level of abstraction (e.g. models). Under no circumstances must aspects be allowed to break the encapsulation of classes or components.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good summary, and I completely share your concerns. I really love the AO paradigm, but AspectJ is simply too powerful. The Java programming language is too low-level for successful AO application.</p>
<p>I prefer applying aspects on a higher level of abstraction (e.g. models). Under no circumstances must aspects be allowed to break the encapsulation of classes or components.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
